O Lord, thou hast searched me, and known me. . . . Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence? — Psalm 139 Join us this 10:00 am tomorrow at 351 centre street for our Sunday service where we’ll be learning about the spiritual life we are living … Continue reading Sunday service 2/5 – Spirit

Everything works and in good condition. New roof in 2012. On board fuel system

TL;DR

This blog post says the opposite of its lazy and deliberately provocative title. I have become a huge fan of ReactiveUI. I just want to ramble about the path I took to get here.

Listening to Paul Betts

I first heard about ReactiveUI at a conference presentation by Paul Betts. I think it was at Xamarin Evolve. Mostly I remember feeling dumb. He said a lot of things that I didn’t understand.

I went to that session without much real experience in Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) development. Conceptually, I understood the idea of a ViewModel. But Paul mostly talked about how ReactiveUI avoids certain problems. And since I had not experienced those problems, his words didn’t sink in.

Talking to teenagers about risk

Each time one of my kids was approaching adolescence, I sat down and explained the risks associated with certain choices. Laws and moral judgements aside, the simple fact is that many choices involve risks, and I thought it would be helpful to pass along that bit of information.

And in each case, my child said, “Thanks Dad”, and proceeded to always make wise and low-risk choices from that point on.

Well, actually, no.

Teenagers simply do not learn that way. They process risk very differently from people who are more mature. Tell a 16-year-old that “if you drive too fast you might get a ticket”. The adolescent will immediately begin driving too fast, and, in all likelihood, will not get ticket. This is how teenagers realize they are smarter than their parents.

Tangent #1: It is almost certainly a good thing that young people are more brave. It would be Very Bad if everybody started out with the same level of risk aversion as the average 65-year-old. Go watch the “Tapestry” episode of Star Trek TNG.

Tangent #2: I really should claim no expertise in parenting, but if somebody forced me to write a book on parenting a teenager, I would say this: Let your kid suffer from their own choices. That said, it is worth the effort to try and help them avoid the really bad mistakes, the ones with consequences that last for decades. But they do have to learn to make their own choices. Realize this as early as you can. The path to frustration starts with making everything all about you.

How we learn new technologies

My metaphor has many problems. For starters, Paul Betts is not my Dad.

Also, the element of adolescent rebellion was not present. I didn’t hear Paul’s wisdom and run in the opposite direction because of my deep need to separate my identity from his. In fact, I started devouring everything I could find on MVVM and IObservable. I really wanted to understand what he was saying.

But the metaphor works in one significant way: Like a teenager, I had to learn by doing. Nobody’s words made much of a difference. None of that reading helped me become a a user of ReactiveUI. I went down another path.

Actually, I went down several other paths.

Maybe it’s just me

I observe that most developers want content that explains how to get something done. “If your objective is to do X, then do the following steps.” The most popular books and articles tend to follow this pattern. Questions of this form are the ones that do well on StackOverflow.

But this is almost never what I want.

I much prefer content that explains how things work. Once I understand that, I can figure out the steps myself.

When I am developing software, I always, ALWAYS do better when I understand what is going on “under hood”, when I can see through the leaky abstractions.

And as I mentioned, I am apparently in the very small minority on this. If 90% of the world disagrees with me, does that put me in the top 10% ? Or does it mean my approach is somehow defective? Modesty aside, my history contains enough successes to allow me some confidence in believing that my approach is better.

I also observe that my approach is just a different spelling for the old adage, “Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime.”

If you tell a software developer what to type and where to click, you can help them complete today’s task. But if you instead teach them how things work, they will be able to apply that understanding on other days too.

Hmmm. I’m talking myself into this. I don’t know why most people prefer shallow recipes, but I really do think deep understanding is better.

Still, I like to stay open-minded about things. I’ve got a lot of failures too.

The truth is that my approach has tradeoffs. The need to understand everything tends to slow me down during the early stages. I usually gain some of that back in the fourth quarter of the game, where deeper understanding is often helpful in diagnosing tricky problems.

But again, in the decision making around software development, absolutes are rare. I’ll admit that sometimes a simple set of steps without depth are exactly what is needed.

Maybe the ReactiveUI docs are just bad?

I don’t know. Maybe. I’ve read the docs plenty. They don’t seem bad to me. I also see nothing there that makes me want to defend them as the best docs ever.

Suppose that I regret not choosing ReactiveUI sooner. Further suppose that I wanted to blame somebody else for my choices. I guess I could find something to complain about. But I also don’t tend to find that criticizing somebody else’s work is helpful.

And remember, I started this journey sitting in front of an audience, listening to Paul Betts, and feeling dumb. To be clear, in that kind of context, I *like* feeling dumb. It’s an opporunity to learn.

So why did I not choose ReactiveUI sooner?

I guess I don’t really know. But I’m pretty sure that nothing has made me appreciate ReactiveUI more than the suffering that comes from not using it.

And that remark isn’t very helpful, is it? I’d like to try and do better. Let’s see…

“Son, it’s just basic statistics. If you’re going to always drive 15 MPH over the speed limit, you will eventually get caught. Suppose you roll the dice 20 times in a row without getting a 12. You still might get a 12 on the next roll, right?”

Oh, wait, wrong topic. Let me try again.

Why is ReactiveUI awesome?

In some software development situations, like mobile apps, if you take a step back and look at the forest instead of the trees, you will see that most of your code is reacting to something that changed.

There are lots of tools you can use to approach this kind of app. You can use C# events and callbacks and switch statements and delegates and lambdas and observables and notifications and bindings and more.

For simple apps, none of these approaches are much better than any other. But as your app gets more complicated, some approaches cope more gracefully than others.

Most cars drive pretty smooth at 30 MPH. But at 75 MPH, some vehicles are still giving a smooth ride, while others are shaking.

Let’s try a conceptual example or two. Suppose you have a button, and you want something to happen when the user presses that button. This is pretty simple. All reasonable solutions to this problem are about the same.

On the other hand, let’s say you have a list of items. The items in that list come from a SQL query. That query has 4 inputs, each of which comes from a UI control. Every time one of those controls changes its value, the query needs to be re-run and the list needs to be updated. A couple of those controls need to be disabled under certain circumstances.

These UI elements have a complicated relationship. We still have plenty of choices in how to express that relationship in code, but this situation is complicated enough that we start to see differences between those approaches. Some of the ones that worked out really well in the simple case seem kinda tedious for this case.

If my driveway has half an inch of snow, all methods of clearing it are about the same. But if my driveway has 15 inches of snow, a shovel is decidedly inferior to a tractor.

Why do I like ReactiveUI? Because I have found that it copes gracefully as the situation gets more complicated.

Why is this? Much of the credit goes to the “reactive” foundation on which ReactiveUI is built. Reactive Extensions. Rx. IObservable. These building blocks are particularly adept at expressing the relationship between a group of things that are changing. ReactiveUI adds another layer (or two) on top of these things to make that expressiveness more convenient when implementing user interfaces.

To be honest, I fudged a little bit when I said that all solutions are roughly equivalent when the problem is simple. That’s not quite true. For simple situations, I’d have to admit that ReactiveUI might be a little worse. There is a learning curve.

If I am writing a grocery list, I could use a word processor, but a pencil and paper is actually simpler. But if I am writing a novel, the word processor is the clear winner.

I’m claiming that the effort to learn Rx and ReactiveUI is worth the trouble. My claim is based on this notion that ReactiveUI shines as complexity increases, but also on my belief that most people underestimate the complexity of their app.

If you disagreed with me above when I said that “most of your code is reacting to something that changed”, you might be underestimating the complexity of your app. It is in fact very common to start implementing under the assumption that something will not change and then later realize that you need notifications or events. Or an observable.

Hmmmm.

Would the paragraphs above have changed my course earlier?

I don’t know. Probably not.

I didn’t start this believing that I could write the best ReactiveUI advocacy ever. Looking at it now, I can’t believe I wrote it with no code in it. The canonical ReactiveUI evangelism pamphlet has gotta have WhenAnyValue() in it somewhere.

I just think it’s interesting that despite my best efforts, I was unable to really understand the benefits of ReactiveUI until I tried using its alternatives. My current project is late. If I had chosen ReactiveUI earlier, maybe it would be, er, less late? There are questions here worth asking.

But am I 100% certain that it is always better to spare yourself the learning experience of using less effective approaches? No.

Can I credibly claim that everyone should choose ReactiveUI in every situation? Certainly not.

Maybe all I can say is that I am currently having a great experience with ReactiveUI.

Maybe that means the rest of this blog post is useless.

But you should have known that when you saw the cheesy title.

 

A few months ago, I took a leave of absence from Google to do a stint with the US Digital Service. A lot of people know about the US Digital Service because they helped rescue the healthcare.gov website. But you might not realize that the US Digital Service has helped veterans get their health benefits, brought bug bounties to the federal government, and helped the IRS protect taxpayer info.

When I joined the US Digital Service, I only planned to stay for three months. That quickly turned into six months after I saw the impact of the USDS. In the last month, I made a big decision. On December 31, 2016, I resigned from Google. I’m currently serving as director of engineering for the USDS. Mikey Dickerson, the first administrator of the USDS, is a political appointee, so he’ll step down on Inauguration Day. When that happens, I’ll serve as acting administrator of the USDS. The work that the USDS does is critical to the American people, and I’m honored to continue that tradition.

If you’re reading this blog post, odds are that you might be a tech geek yourself. I’d like to ask you to review what the US Digital Service has accomplished in just a few years. If you’re a more visual person, you might enjoy this short video:

Working for the government doesn’t pay as well as a big company in Silicon Valley. We don’t get any free lunches. Many days are incredibly frustrating. All I can tell you is that the work is deeply important and inspiring, and you have a chance to work on things that genuinely make peoples’ lives better. A friend who started working in this space several years ago told me “These last five years have been the hardest and worst and best and most rewarding I think I will ever have.”

If you have experience in the tech industry, there’s a decent chance that you have skills that can benefit the American people. If you’re considering joining the US Digital Service, please fill out an application.

Pretty much 100% of developers working for other people end up signing some kind of “proprietary invention agreement,” but almost all of them misunderstand what’s going on with that agreement. Most developers think that the work they do at work belongs to their employer, but anything they work on at home or on their own time is theirs. This is wrong enough to be dangerous.

So let’s consider this question: if you’re a developer working for software company, does that company own what you do in your spare time?

Before I start: be careful before taking legal advice from the Internet. I see enough wrong information that you could get in trouble. Non-US readers should also be aware that the law and legal practice could be completely different in their country.

There are three pieces of information you would need to know to answer this question:

1. What state (or country) are you employed in?

There are state laws that vary from state to state which may even override specific contracts.

2. What does your contract with your employer say?

In the US, in general, courts are very lenient about letting people sign any kind of contract they want, but sometimes, state laws will specifically say “even if you sign such and such a contract, the law overrides.”

3. Are you a contractor or an employee? In the US there are two different ways you might be hired, and the law is different in each case.

But before I can even begin to explain these issues, we gotta break it down.

Imagine that you start a software company. You need a developer. So you hire Sarah from across the street and make a deal whereby you will pay her $20 per hour and she will write lines of code for your software product. She writes the code, you pay her the $20/hour, and all is well. Right?

Well… maybe. In the United States, if you hired Sarah as a contractor, she still owns the copyright on that work. That is kind of weird, because you might say, “Well, I paid her for it.” It sounds weird, but it is the default way copyright works. In fact, if you hire a photographer to take pictures for your wedding, you own the copies of the pictures that you get, but the photographer still owns the copyright and has the legal monopoly on making more copies of those pictures. Surprise! Same applies to code.

Every software company is going to want to own the copyright to the code that its employees write for them, so no software company can accept the “default” way the law works. That is why all software companies that are well-managed will require all developers, at the very least, to sign an agreement that says, at the very least, that

• in exchange for receiving a salary,
• the developer agrees to “assign” (give) the copyright to the company.

This agreement can happen in the employment contract or in a separate “Proprietary Invention Assignment” contract. The way it is often expressed is by using the legal phrase work for hire, which means “we have decided that the copyright will be owned by the company, not the employee.”

Now, we still haven’t said anything about spare time work yet. Suppose, now, you have a little game company. Instead of making software, you knock out three or four clever games every few months. You can’t invent all the games yourself. So you go out and hire a game designer to invent games. You are going to pay the game designer $6,000 a month to invent new games. Those games will be clever and novel. They are patentable. It is important to you, as a company, to own the patents on the games.

Your game designer works for a year and invents 7 games. At the end of the year, she sues you, claiming that she owns 4 of them, because those particular games were invented between 5pm and 9am, when she wasn’t on duty.

Ooops. That’s not what you meant. You wanted to pay her for all the games that she invents, and you recognize that the actual process of invention for which you are paying her may happen at any time… on weekdays, weekends, in the office, in the cubicle, at home, in the shower, climbing a mountain on vacation.

So before you hire this developer, you agree, “hey listen, I know that inventing happens all the time, and it’s impossible to prove whether you invented something while you were sitting in the chair I supplied in the cubicle I supplied or not. I don’t just want to buy your 9:00-5:00 inventions. I want them all, and I’m going to pay you a nice salary to get them all,” and she agrees to that, so now you want to sign something that says that all her inventions belong to the company for as long as she is employed by the company.

This is where we are by default. This is the standard employment contract for developers, inventors, and researchers.

Even if a company decided, “oh gosh, we don’t want to own the 5:00-9:00 inventions,” they would soon get into trouble. Why? Because they might try to take an investment, and the investor would say, “prove to me that you’re not going to get sued by some disgruntled ex-employee who claims to have invented the things that you’re selling.” The company wants to be able to pull out a list of all current and past employees, and show a contract from every single one of them assigning inventions to the company. This is expected as a part of due diligence in every single high tech financing, merger, and acquisition, so a software company that isn’t careful about getting these assignments is going to have trouble getting financed, or merging, or being acquired, and that ONE GUY from 1998 who didn’t sign the agreement is going to be a real jerk about signing it now, because he knows that he’s personally holding up a $350,000,000 acquisition and he can demand a lot of money to sign.

So… every software company tries to own everything that its employees do. (They don’t necessarily enforce it in cases of unrelated hobby projects, but on paper, they probably can.)

Software developers, as you can tell from this thread, found this situation to be upsetting. They always imagined that they should be able to sit in their own room at night on their own computer writing their own code for their own purposes and own the copyright and patents. So along came state legislators, in certain states (like California) but not others (not New York, for example). These state legislatures usually passed laws that said something like this:

Anything you do on your own time, with your own equipment, that is not related to your employer’s line of work is yours, even if the contract you signed says otherwise.

Because this is the law of California, this particular clause is built into the standard Nolo contract and most of the standard contracts that California law firms give their software company clients, so programmers all over the country might well have this in their contract even if their state doesn’t require it.

Let’s look at that closely.

On your own time. Easy to determine, I imagine.

With your own equipment. Trivial to determine.

Not related to your employer’s line of work. Um, wait. What’s the definition of related? If my employer is Google, they do everything. They made a goddamn HOT AIR BALLOON with an internet router in it once. Are hot air balloons related? Obviously search engines, mail, web apps, and advertising are related to Google’s line of work. Hmmm.

OK, what if my employer is a small company making software for the legal industry. Would software for the accounting industry be “related”?

I don’t know. It’s a big enough ambiguity that you could drive a truck through it. It’s probably going to depend on a judge or jury.

The judge (or jury) is likely to be friendly to the poor employee against Big Bad Google, but you can’t depend on it.

This ambiguity is meant to create enough of a chilling effect on the employee working in their spare time that for all intents and purposes it achieves the effect that the employer wants: the employee doesn’t bother doing any side projects that might turn into a business some day, and the employer gets a nice, refreshed employee coming to work in the morning after spending the previous evening watching TV.

So… to answer the question. There is unlikely to be substantial difference between the contracts that you sign at various companies in the US working as a developer or in the law that applies. All of them need to purchase your copyright and patents without having to prove that they were generated “on the clock,” so they will all try to do this, unless the company is being negligent and has not arranged for appropriate contracts to be in place, in which case, the company is probably being badly mismanaged and there’s another reason not to work there.

The only difference is in the stance of management as to how hard they want to enforce their rights under these contracts. This can vary from:

• We love side projects. Have fun!
• We don’t really like side projects. You should be thinking about things for us.
• We love side projects. We love them so much we want to own them and sell them!
• We are kinda indifferent. If you piss us off, we will look for ways to make you miserable. If you leave and start a competitive company or even a half-competitive company, we will use this contract to bring you to tears. BUT, if you don’t piss us off, and serve us loyally, we’ll look the other way when your iPhone app starts making $40,000 a month.

It may vary depending on whom you talk to, who is in power at any particular time, and whether or not you’re sleeping with the boss. You’re on your own, basically—the only way to gain independence is to be independent. Being an employee of a high tech company whose product is intellectual means that you have decided that you want to sell your intellectual output, and maybe that’s OK, and maybe it’s not, but it’s a free choice.

NASA has awarded contracts to nine companies to provide specialized engineering, aeronautics, and manufacturing support for Flight Operations Directorate work, facilities, and aircraft at the agency’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.

⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️
⬜️⬜️🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾
⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾
🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾
🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⬜️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🏠🌿🌿🌿🏠🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🏠🌿🏠🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌿🏠🌿🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🏠🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🚴🏽🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🅰️🌾❤️📝❗️🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🦁🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🦁🌾🦁🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🦁🌾🌾🌾🐯🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🦁🌾🐯🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🦁🦁🐯🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳
🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🐒🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🐒🌾🐒🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌳🌲🌾🌾🌲🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🐒🌾🌾🌾🐒🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🐒🌾🐒🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🐒🐒🐒🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🐘🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🐪🌾🐘🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🐘🌾🌾🌾🐘🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🐘🌾🐘🌾🌾🌾🐧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🐘🐘🐘🌾🌾🐧🌾🐧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌲
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐧🌾🌾🌾🐧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐧🌾🐧🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🐍🌾🌾🐧🐧🐧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🐢🌾🐍🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🐍🌾🌾🌾🐍🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🐍🌾🐸🌾🌾🌾🐻🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🐍🐍🐸🌾🌾🐻🌾🐻🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐻🌾🌾🌾🐻🌾🌾🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐻🌾🐻🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🐻🐻🐻🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🐰🐰🐰🐰🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🐮🐮🐮🐮🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🐷🐷🐷🐷🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🐑🐑🐑🐑🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🐴🐴🐴🐴🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌿🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🐿🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌿🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🐕🚶🏻🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏽🌾🌻🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌻🌺🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌻🌺💧🌺🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾🌾🌻🌺🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌻🌺🌹🌺🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌻🌺🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌺💧🌺🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌺🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾🌾🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌺🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌺🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌺🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌵🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾👬🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾👬🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🏊🏊🏊🌊🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🏊🏊🏊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾👬🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🏊🏊🏊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🎪🎪🎪⛱⛱⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌊🌊🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
🌾🌾👬🌾🌾🎪🌾🍧🍊🚾🌾⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊😵😵🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🌾🍭🌮🚿🌾⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🌾🍉🌾🍕🌾⛱🌊🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊😵😵🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🌾🍟🍺🎈🌾⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🎪🌾🌡♻️👙🌾⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊😵😵🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🌾🌾🍔🍹🌾⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
🌾🌾🌾🚴🏽🌾🎪🌾📸🌯👮🏻🌾⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊😵😵🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🌾🎪😡🌭🌾⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪⛱⛱⛱⛱⛱⛱🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
🌾👬🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌾🌿🌿🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🐟🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊⛵️⛵️⛵️🚣🏽🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊⛵️⛵️⛵️🚣🏽🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🚣🏽⛵️⛵️⛵️🚣🏽🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🚣🏽🚣🏽🚣🏽🚣🏽🚣🏽🌾🌾👬🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾⛱🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳⛱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳⛱🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌳🐤🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🐛🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🚴🏼🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🐰🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾
🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾💧💧💧🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾💧💧💧💧💧🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌳🌳🌾🌾💧💧💧💧💧💧💧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌳🌳🌾🌾💧💧💧💧💧💧💧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌳🌳🌾🌾💧💧💧💧💧💧💧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾📽📽🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾💧💧💧💧💧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾💧💧💧🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🎞🎞🎞🎞🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🐍🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🤖👨‍👩‍👧‍👦👨‍👩‍👧‍👧👨‍👩‍👦‍👦🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🐭🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🍧👨‍👩‍👧🌭👨‍👩‍👧🌾🌳🌲🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾👩‍👩‍👦🍿👨‍👩‍👧‍👦👨‍👩‍👧🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🐞🌳🌲🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾👨‍👩‍👧‍👦👻👨‍👩‍👧‍👦🍕🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌿🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾👨‍👩‍👦‍👦👫👸👪🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🍭👫🍭👨‍👩‍👧‍👧🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🐰🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌲🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌿🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🐿🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🍫👭👨‍👩‍👧‍👦👨‍👩‍👧‍👧🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾👪🐶👬👨‍👩‍👧🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌿🌾🌳🌳🌾👩‍👩‍👦🍿👨‍👩‍👧‍👦👫🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾👮🏻👨‍👩‍👧‍👦👨‍👩‍👧😱🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾👬👨‍👩‍👧🍭🍭🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾👩‍👩‍👧‍👦👽👨‍👩‍👦‍👦👨‍👩‍👦‍👦🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🎞🎞🎞🎞🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾📽📽🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾👫🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🚴🏽🌳🌳🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌷🌷🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾♻️🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌷🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🐛🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾👫🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌺🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🏃🏻🌳🌾🌾🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌹🌾🌾🌾✊🏿🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌳🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🐛🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌸🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🚾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🐕🚶🏻🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾✊🏿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🐝🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🐜🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌲🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌺🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾♻️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐞🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🏃🏻🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🚴🏽🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🐝🌾🌾🌸🌾🌾🌳🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐝🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🚏🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌲🌲🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌⛳️🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌲🏃🏻🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🐿🌲🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾⛳️🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌲🌲🌲🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🚴🏼🌳🌲🌲🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌⛳️🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳📱🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌳🌳🌾🌾📱🌾🌾🌾🌾⛳️🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌⛳️🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛳️🏌🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾⛳️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌲🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌⛳️⛳️🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛳️⛳️🌾🏌🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌⛳️🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛳️⛳️🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌🏌🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌺🌾🌾🌾🌾⛳️🏌🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾⛳️🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐿🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🏌🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌾👨‍👩‍👧‍👧🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾⛳️🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌹🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌺🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🐦🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🏌🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🚾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🏃🏻🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌺🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾⛳️🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🏌🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌺🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌺🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾👫🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾♻️🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾👍🏽🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🏃🏃🏃🌾💦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🐿🌾🌳🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🏃🏾⏱🌾🏃🏃🏃🏿🏃🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏿🏃🏃🏃🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🏃📱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎪🌾🏃🏃🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🚾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏃🏃🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🎪🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🏼🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾👬🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🎧🌾🏃🏃🌾🌾♿️🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾👏🏼🌾🌾🏃🏃🏿🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏼🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾💦🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾👏🏾🌾🌾🏃🎪🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾⏱🌾🏃🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🐿🌲🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾👨‍👩‍👧‍👧🌾🏃🏾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🏃🏃🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏃🏃🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🎪🏅🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🏅🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌳🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🏅🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃💦🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🍺🍌🍺🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🚫🌾🚫🌾🚫🌾🌳🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🍌🍊🍌🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🚫🌾🚫🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🍺🍌🍺🌾🏃🌾🌳🌳🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🏃🌾🌾👮🏼🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾💧💧🌾🌾🌳🌾🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🏃🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾💧💧🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌾🌳🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🐌🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🚶🏼🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🚴🏼🌾🌾🌳🌳🐿🌳🌳🌳🍄🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾Ⓜ️1️⃣8️⃣🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🌲🌳🐜🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌲🌳🐞🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌿🌳🌿🌳🌳🌳🐿🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌾🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🐝🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🚴🏼🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🎶🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌞🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🎶🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🎶🌳🌳🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾
🌾🌿🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🐦🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🐿🌳🌳🐦🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🐛🌳🌳🌳🎶🌳🐦🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🐦🌲🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾
🌾💩🌾🌳🌳🌳🐦🐦🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🎶🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🎶🐦🌳🐿🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🐦🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🎶🐦🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🎶🐦🌳🌳🐦🐦🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌲🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌳🐿🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌳🌳🐦🌳🌲🐦🎶🌳🌳🌳🎶🐦🌳🌲🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🚴🏼🌾🌾🌾🌳🎶🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🎶🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌲🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🐦🌳👨‍👩‍👦‍👦🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🚴🏼🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🐦🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🎶🌾🌿🌾🌾
🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🐦🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🎶🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🐦🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌲🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾
🌾🌾🚶🏻🌾🌲🌷⛲️🌹🌹🌹⛲️🌷🌲🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌲🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌷🌹🌻🌻🌻🌹🌷🌲🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳
🌳🌳🌾🌾🌲🌷🌹🌻⛲️🌻🌹🌷🌲🌾👨‍👨‍👦🌳🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌳🌲🌳
🌳🌲🌳🌾🌲🌷🌹🌻🌻🌻🌹🌷🌲🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌷⛲️🌹🌹🌹⛲️🌷🌲🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🐜🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌲🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌳🐿🌲🌳
🌾🌾🌳🌲🌾🌾📱🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🏃🏼🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌲🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🐝🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌿🌳🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌳🌾💏🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🐞🌾🌾🌾🌿🌳
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌳🌾🏃🏼🌲🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌿🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩🌾🌲🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌲🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌲🌳🌳🌾🌳🌳🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🐝🌾🌾🌾🌾
🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾🌾🌾🌳🌾👨‍❤️‍💋‍👨🌾🌳🌾

It is the fourth visible user interface of the personal computer era.

The first was character mode. MS-DOS.
The second was the GUI, graphical user interface. Macintosh and Windows.
The third was touch. iPhone and Android.
The fourth is spatial computing.

At each introduction of a new user interface some companies either went away or became dramatically less important. When GUI’s came along Borland and Wordperfect, both companies bet on the older character mode and promptly went away.

Same when touch came along. Nokia and Blackberry bet against touch, or didn’t react nearly strongly, nor quickly, enough. They are either gone or really much less important than they once were.

I can not see a world where Apple goes away, not with $220 billion in cash reserves.

But I CAN see a world where Tim Cook goes away and his legacy is dramatically changed.

The Apple Watch didn’t hurt him. At least not beyond a small skin scratch. That will not be true when spatial computing comes along.

First, what is spatial computing? Run a Google Search on the term and you find: “Spatial Computing is a set of ideas and technologies that will transform our lives by understanding the physical world, knowing and communicating our relation to places in that world, and navigating through those places. The transformational potential of Spatial Computing is evident.”

It already is arriving, though. Self-driving cars use spatial computing. Robots use spatial computing. Drones, especially ones that map out the world at some level, are using spatial computing. Google will soon introduce spatial computing to smartphones, in the introduction of Tango sensors that map out the world. Robots use spatial computing, particularly those from Boston Dynamics, another Google company.

Finally, mixed reality glasses use spatial computing. Microsoft Hololens is showing you spatial computing and the four video cameras on that product that map out the real world are what bring you both spatial computing and mixed reality. Magic Leap is preparing to launch products in the next 18 months, and has $1.3 billion invested in it so far by a group of companies led by Google and Baidu. Only insiders are paying attention, but both products let you walk around the real world and see virtual items placed on them. Go to YouTube and search for Hololens and you’ll see lots of demos of what spatial computing looks like.

Now, it isn’t clear yet to most people what will force Apple’s hand here. That’s the crazy thing. I know of several mixed-reality-spatial-computing glasses under development:

1. Magic Leap.
2. Microsoft Hololens.
3. Meta.
4. Apple??
5. Facebook. (Zuckerberg already announced he’s working on such).
6. Amazon?? (Its delivery drone has a paper-thin radar in it that my nerdy friends say is quite brilliant).

I’m seeing amazing demos, I’ve been including a few in my speeches around the world, and meeting with engineers that are working on some of these projects (later this week I’ll be in Israel to meet with such).

Also Meta and others are developing new spatial user interfaces. If you haven’t seen my tour of Meta that I did back in February (you need to be logged into Facebook to view), you really should. There you’ll meet some of the people who developed Tango, but are building a new user interface.

Anyway, back to the point. I bet that Tim Cook is going to try to follow Steve Jobs’ playbook. Which is watch everyone else prove there’s a market but wait until you can provide a better alternative. After all, the iPod wasn’t the first audio player. The iPhone wasn’t the first smartphone. The iPad wasn’t the first tablet.

We know Apple and Tim Cook knows what’s coming. Cook hired a professor from Virginia Tech who has seen Magic Leap. Or at least his students had seen it. Cook also has bought a number of companies in VR and AR, including Metaio, which showed me monsters on top of buildings years ago.

So Cook is prepared and he seems to be working hard with teams to come up with new products. Just read MacRumors rundown of all the moves Apple is making and you’ll see Tim Cook has all the ingredients to compete in this spatial computing world.

Here is the rub: Tim Cook isn’t Steve Jobs. He doesn’t have the market thinking he’s a genius. It will be a LOT more skeptical of Cook’s claims than it did toward Jobs. Cook rarely talks about products. He’s not someone I expect to sit down with for an evening and talk about great new products, like, say, a Tesla, and have a stream of visionary feedback about what does and doesn’t work.

Cook doesn’t seem like the kind of guy who can get a superhuman effort out of a development team, either, the way Jobs could. Which is important for focusing a team on a market window. Lets be honest, most of the world’s great products came with quite a bit of pain on behalf of employees. Will Cook’s nicer way of working work at Apple to bring us a world-defining product? The jury is out.

So there are a lot of questions, heck, questions that the Apple Watch didn’t answer, and, in fact, caused to get louder.

Is Cook a product guy? So far the answer is no, he’s not.

To date that hasn’t hurt his legacy. He’s still leading the best company on earth. The one with the best retail stores. The best innovation legacy. The best brand. The best supply chain. The best marketing and PR teams. The best profits. These are daunting advantages for Apple, but if Magic Leap ships and Apple can’t match it for years you’ll see many switch brand preference. Then Tim Cook really will be gone and his legacy will not be a sweet one, but rather a sour one as the guy who hobbled Apple.

All this is saying is a new user interface is coming. Will it bring with it major corporate change the way previous user interfaces have?

History says yes.

Tim Cook better worry.

On the other hand, if Tim Cook delivers in the coming spatial computing era, well, then, he will finally put Steve Jobs in a box that Apple can really move forward from.

Are you a betting person? If so, where would you put your money?

Honestly? I just am not hearing good things out of Cupertino lately and the folks at Google and Microsoft are bringing real innovations to the market.

The post Spatial Computing: why Tim Cook better worry appeared first on Scobleizer.

GOLDEN, CO—Their eyes widening in amazement as the 43-year-old rattled off the names of heavy hitter after heavy hitter, impressed members of the Dreeshen household confirmed Friday that the roster for their mom’s upcoming dinner party was absolutely stacked. “Wow, she’s got Joyce from work, Cheri, Dana from yoga, Carol, Carol’s new husband—that’s all of the A-listers, together under one roof,” said Dreeshen’s daughter Michelle, wondering aloud how her mother managed to nail down such a jam-packed murderers’ row of neighborhood all-stars. “Jesus, she even managed to pull Dr. Fuller and the Jacobsons. Top to bottom, it’s just loaded. There’s not a single weak spot in the entire guest list.” Sources reported that such an imposing, big-name lineup would “absolutely crush” the likely dinner party topics of the Wannemakers’ new deck and Carol’s upcoming trip to Italy with her son …

As a new student of Christian Science and a young mother of a toddler and an
infant, I found myself riddled with fear following a sleepless night caring for our two girls with symptoms of flue or a cold.

Being new to the area, living five hours from family and not knowing any Christian Scientists in the small mountain community where we lived, I felt isolated, alone and fearful.

I had phoned a Christian Science Practitioner for prayerful help…. A Christian
Science Practitioner is dedicated to providing healing prayer, available twenty four hours a day and can be located in a listing in the churches’ monthly periodical: The Christian Science Journal.
The symptoms of fever were eliminated immediately, but the sound of the coughing in the night seemed to create a knee-jerk, fearful response in my thought.

The practitioner’s patient, loving assurance of God’s tender omnipotent care for
each of His children helped calm my thought. But within a short time, after each call, the sound of the congestion seemed to create a hypnotic fearful focus on the physical evidence. Then an interesting thing happened. As I reached for the phone to call the practitioner yet a third time that morning the thought came…“I wish Jesus were here”, followed immediately with the strong affirming thought… “He is”.

As I put the receiver back on its cradle without making the call, I felt the warm tender embrace of divine Love. The fear melted away. Of course, as I thought about what had taken place, I knew that Jesus, the man, was not present… but the Christ, the power of omnipotent, omnipresent God, good that Jesus was sent to demonstrate was present and active. The symptoms of congestion quickly dissipated and the girls were soon happy and free.

The prayerful support of the practioner helped free my thought to be able to receive the angel thought needed..Psalms 91:11 “He shall give His angels charge over thee to keep thee in all thy ways.”